two UAAP Season 78 ball games I watched September 2015:
9/25: Ateneo vs UST. Ateneo was leading as much as 16 in the 3rd quarter, then lost.
9/16: Ateneo vs NU.
Ateneo won after double overtime. Everybody was tired when it ended:
I went to the northern tip of the Philippines for a weekend in August 2015.*
Got to Vigan, Ilocos Sur just before sunrise. It was pitch black except for a Frank’s stall, where I grabbed a hotdog, and then had a second meal after walking around looking at the well preserved classical Filipino architecture. My second meal was a Filipino breakfast with Vigan longganisa. These are my some of favorite kinds of sausages, typical Filipino longganisa is sweet, but these are salty.
13 photos in this slideshow. click left and right arrows to navigate.
Next stop was Bangui, Ilocos Norte. The famous windmills were situated on an empty stretch of beach. Aside from 5 stalls selling some souvenirs for tourists, there was nobody else for miles around.
Click here to view map of the route from Vigan to Bangui.
Afterwards, went even more north to Pagudpud, Ilocos Norte and checked into Pannzian Beach Resort. It’s a cozy and affordable place with lots of good, healthy food.
14 photos in this slideshow. click left and right arrows to navigate.
8 photos in this slideshow. click left and right arrows to navigate.
Spotted this interesting sign while leaving the sand dunes. I like its font, and the name’s mysterious rustic feel which doesn’t give you a clue what the place is about.
Note: I didn’t bring my camera for this trip, so all these photos were shot with a cameraphone.
Click here to see more photos from this trip on Flickr.
Santiago, Chile, July 2014
click to see more of my photos from Chile
Valparaiso, Chile, May 2014
click to see more of my photos from Chile
March 15, 2014 – Game 4 of the UAAP Season 76 Women’s Volleyball Finals
Ateneo de Manila vs De La Salle University
Ateneo de Manila University Blue Eagles vs. NU Bulldogs
UAAP 76 basketball game
September 11, 2013
First posted two photographs of this wall in Aurora Boulevard, San Juan, Philippines taken 5 months apart in 2013 here.
Two years after, I went back and shot it again, it’s changed!
I also shot it last year in 2014, two months apart.
watch my video about this “grinning face” pattern that’s covering the September 2014 wall.
Here are the 2013 photos:
Like I said in my first post during my layover in Atlanta going to Chile, the MARTA subway is directly connected to the domestic terminal, like Hong Kong or Singapore, making it very convenient for tourists to pop into the city for a quick look. There’s a free shuttle going to the domestic terminal from international, which takes around 20 minutes, so factor that in your time computations.
I hit some human traffic in the subway though, it was very surprising because during my first layover in March, the subway was clean and empty. It turns out there was a 4th of July fun run that morning, and people were all getting on the subway to get to the run’s starting point.
I got out somewhere near the same Peachtree stop I got out of in March 2014, walked around, and even bumped into a cool guy named Jo Ferrow, who’s also into photography. Together we walked around the street nearby where the run was taking place, and the park where people was cooling down.
Here’s a few more on my Flickr page
The boxing match between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather, Jr. on May 3, 2015 was one of the most highly anticipated boxing matches ever here in the Philippines.
I went to photograph people watching the match on live pay per view at three different places in Poblacion, Makati.
I ended up staying to watch at the third place with the tent. got kicked out of the covered court for taking photos (some guy said i may try to use the photos to make people think he’s running for politics. i don’t even know who he is) and the second place was too crowded.
Aside from the negative experience of being kicked out of a venue by a paranoid would-be-politician (see above), I was happy to be welcomed by the group watching Pay Per View on a 32″ TV in the tent a few streets down.
for more photos, please go to this Flickr album.
Sagada is a small town that lies 275 km north of Metro Manila (according to wikipedia). Went there for two days in March.
(click left and right arrows to navigate, hover to pause)
(click left and right arrows to navigate, hover to pause):
Saw the famous hanging coffins of Sagada. Went to two sites for it, Echo Valley and Lumiang Burial Cave.
Our guide had a pretty cool old school kerosene lamp that he carried all the way the three hour caving trip.
(click left and right arrows to navigate, hover to pause)
More photos from this trip here on Flickr.
—driving notes: —
We followed Google Maps’ navigation suggestion and somehow ended up taking the Ilocos route after TPLEX, and ended up only 8 km away from Sagada, but couldn’t proceed as the dirt road was blocked by a tree that fell in the night. The route the whole way there was devoid of passing cars. It turns out that’s not the typical route people take going to Sagada- which would be Halselma Highway.
After some difficulty backing out of the empty and narrow dirt road blocked by the tree, we saw a local who pointed us the right way towards Staunton Road, which leads into town. It was 6:30 AM, 9-10 straight hours of driving.
Flew from Manila to Bohol’s domestic airport in Tagbilaran City.
Stayed on Panglao’s Alona Beach.
Went on some great dives with Philippine Fun Divers.
Bohol Bee Farm had some excellent food. Had a little tour of the place, here’s a live beehive.
Stopped in the middle of the road to photograph a man made mahogany forest.
Visited the famous Chocolate Hills.
Took the Loboc River cruise. The lines on top of the photo are ziplines.
Had fresh seafood dinners along Alona Beach.
This is a tarsier, the world’s smallest primate, who calls Bohol home.
Island hopped to Virgin Island which has a sandbar and a forbidding set of rules posted:
“As if sprung fully formed from Zeus’s head”. That’s what I thought when I first saw the watch and shoes in the photo below.
I’ve always had a weakness for shoes, but I’ve curbed that fetish for a while. Addiction to shopping, no matter how reasonably priced the item, is fragilizing. I developed a thing for watches over the past two years, but I vowed to stop hoarding them too. This watch is one of the last pieces I bought, for the same reason I bought the shoes. Can you see what made me break my “no shopping for unnecessary clothing” rule?
No, not the fact that they’re both reddish-hued. To borrow one of Apple’s neologisms, it’s because of their “unibody” constructions. This watch is a solar watch, no need to open it to insert a battery. Flipping the case over, you’ll see it’s sealed, there are no screws or backplate. It’s like a round disc carved from a single piece of plastic. Near seamless, with only a thin line demarcating the top from the bottom of the case.
I love boat shoes. I have three others- both leather and canvas. Traditionally manufactured boat shoes have a lot of pieced together parts, laces, flap, tassels. If not designed well, the shoe ends up looking too “busy”.
What drew me to this pair is its clean one-piece look. The shoe upper is made of a single piece of injection molded PVC. I’m most charmed by the plastic-molded simulated lace-threading-through-eyelets detail. There’s something futuristic and otherworldly about them, like they were created in a vacuum bubble by a magical 3D printer.
3. A low price of US$150 (very cheap for a good quality 100% Swiss made automatic watch. A lot of “Swiss made” watches you see are actually made elsewhere, but feature Swiss movements. Nothing wrong with their build quality, but misleading wording allow them to charge premium prices.)
The first point is impressive enough for a fully-mechanical watch with no electronics or quartz heartbeat or battery in it. But the proclamation that shocked everybody is that the watch will be manufactured, from start to finish, untouched by human hands.
Why do people still buy automatic watches in 2014? Many people nowadays use their mobiles to tell time. Quartz watches are much cheaper and accurate and you don’t need to wind if you stop wearing them for a day. I don’t know other people’s reasons, but one of mine is to feel a link to history.
Wearing a mechanical watch that I need to wind every now and then reminds me that while we’ve come a long way from the days of Gutenberg’s manual printing press and the Geocentric model of the universe, I’m wearing a sophisticated marvel engineered and crafted in almost the same manner as it was centuries ago. It reminds me of one of man’s earliest successful attempt at using technology to tame and understand something abstract and nebulous.
I’m also charmed by the way the seconds hand in automatic watches sweeps instead of the typical jerky tick-tock forward inching of quartz watches. It reminds you of time’s passing, but in a smoother, gentler manner. It sweeps that way because of the way the gears inside move. Theintricacy of the gears in mechanical watches make it necessary for the fine horological artisans of Switzerland and Japan to manually assemblemany of the internal parts.
That’s what makes the manufacturing process of the Sistem 51 watch so revolutionary. It bridges centuries together. Centuries-old mechanical design with futuristic high-tech assembly. Something that has never been done before.
That this watch exists is contradictory and thought provoking. What does it mean for our future if something previously thought as “can only be built by humans” could actually be made well and cheaply by machines?
A “go” bag is a bag you keep near you in cases of emergency. It’s supposed to contain everything you need to survive for the next 72 hours. Knives, dried food, some medicine, etc.
Canon users, these are my lens recommendations for your photography go bag.
Now, for the TL;DR version, in which I tell the story of all the lenses I’ve loved.
Informal glossary for people who are new to camera reviews so we’ll be on the same page. Please feel free to skip ahead if you know these terms:
1. Prime lens- a one piece lens that doesn’t “zoom in or out”
2. zoom lens- a lens that moves to “zoom in or out”. a zoom lens is not necessarily a telephoto lens. you can have an ultra wide zoom where the tele end is only 22 or 18 mm.
3. APS-C- Canon’s smaller sized DSLR format. you multiply a lens’s focal length by 1.6 to get its equivalent focal length IF the lens is mounted on a full-frame (35mm) body.
4. kit lens- the “default” inexpensive zoom lens that’s paired with your DSLR when you buy it. you can also opt to buy just a DSLR body sans kit lens
5. EF- canon’s lens mount that works on both full frame and APS-C bodies (on Nikon, it’s FX)
6. EF-S- canon’s lens mount that works only on Canon’s cameras with the smaller APS-C sensors (on Nikon, it’s DX)
7. normal lens- people say it’s something that’s around 40 to 50 mm focal length, that approximates the field of view of the human eye.
I got my very first DSLR in April 2007. It was a Canon 400D body paired with Canon’s most famous nifty 50, the EF 50mm f/1.4. I bought this prime after much research because it was Canon’s cheapest “good glass”, and the nifty 50 has a long, respected history in photography. All the review sites recommended getting the EF 50 as a starter lens, whether to upgrade your kit lens, or as your first lens. I ended up just getting this prime, and buying a 400D body sans kit lens.
However, the 50mm mounted on an APS-C body made it the equivalent of 80 mm on a full-frame body. 80mm is already a bit too telephoto for me. I had to step back a lot when I wanted to get more of a scene in. Because it was already a medium telephoto on my camera, I didn’t actually get to enjoy its much-vaunted “best normal lens” reputation.
I used just this one lens for a whole year. It was really good discipline training because I had to really plan about how I’m going to get a shot because my view was too “zoomed in” because on my camera, a 50mm normal lens is a medium telephoto. I couldn’t just snap away because if I did, I’d only get a somewhat close-up view of what I wanted to shoot.
After a few months, I was already able to anticipate what kind of view I’d see if I’m standing at a particular distance from an object. I also love the f/1.4 aperture, it allowed for great shots in low light.
However after a year I got tired of having the super “Zoomed in” view all the time and having to adjust for it. Thus began my journey to find the perfect lens for me.
I bought two lenses next, both second hand. one was the Canon EF 28-105 mm f/3.5-4.5 zoom lens, another is the Canon EF 20mm f/2.8 prime. I bought the zoom lens because it was really cheap, although I rarely used the far telephoto end. The wide end of 28 mm multiplied by 1.6 is 44.8 mm on a full-frame body. In other words, its wide end is a normal lens focal length, and I wanted to try that, afterhaving used the EF 50mm for months but not actually enjoying its true normal lens focal length.
I got the 20mm also because it was cheap and I wanted something that could approximate 35mm on a full frame, the favorite focal length of many street photographers. (20mm multiplied by 1.6 is 32 mm.)
I eventually sold it because I found the Canon EF 20mm too long and bulky. I replaced it with a tiny, near pancake sized Sigma 24 mm f/2.8. It was cute and light, but while it mounts on any EOS model Canon and syncs electronically; because the Sigma is old, from the mid 90s (I bought it second hand), autofocus works, but theaperture is limited to only f/2.8.
I sold both that and the 28-105mm sometime in 2008, and replaced it with yet another secondhand all-around zoom lens, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm.
I bought it pretty cheaply, 50% off retail. It’s a smidgen wider than a kit lens, and has a little more telephoto reach. Like the 28-105mm I had some years back, I rarely used the telephoto end of the 17-85, as my preference is for going in close and shooting wide.
To recap, by 2009, I had only two lenses- the Canon EF-S 17- 85mm zoom lens, and the Canon EF 50 mm prime (which is “longer” than a normal when mounted on my APS-C body).
I wanted something wider though. That was when I got the Canon EF-S 10-22 mm ultrawide angle zoom lens, the first non-second hand lens i bought since my very first lens, the aforementioned Canon nifty 50. Ever since then, that has become my favorite lens.
I used it all over Manila shooting graffiti and urban landscapes, took it to Taipei, Bali, Guam, Chiang Mai, and Penang. Before I finally sold it off this September 2014, I even took it to Chile.
When I went to Chile, that was my primary lens. I was tempted to bring the whole kit and caboodle with me, but I limited myself to two lenses- the 10- 22 ultrawide and the Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 pancake I bought in 2012.
For the longest time I have prayed to the camera gods for Canon to release a smaller and lighter form factor normal lens. I was so jealous of Nikon’s 35mm DX prime. in 2012, they finally came out with the teeny tiny Canon EF 40mm, and at only $200 retail, it was a no brainer to get it.
I did wish they made it 30mm instead of 40mm though. 40 mm on an APS-C crop body is pushing it into medium telephoto already, but Canon wants to push out a lens that both full frame and crop bodies can use cause they’re too cheap to make an EF-S exclusive unlike that Nikon DX 35 mm (DX is the EF-S of Nikon. FX is their EF). Hmph.
It was why I was overjoyed to hear that Canon is coming out with a Canon EF-S 24mm late this 2014! The retail price is also supposed to be only $200 or a little under that, and I’ll definitely get it.
But back to the ultrawide, why did I sell it? If i loved it so much? Because in May 2014, they announced the Canon EF-S 10-18mm ultrawide zoom (only their second ultrawide ever for APS-C bodies). It’s only $350, compared to the almost $800 initial asking price of the EF-S 10-22 !
Did they cut corners to get this low low price? Yes, but they were acceptable compromises. The lens mount is no longer stainless steel, but plastic. But for me that’s a benefit, as it made the lens much lighter. Big guys may not notice the weight, but every additional gram shaved off camera equipment is a plus for my neck.
Another “flaw” compared to the older ultrawide is the 10-18 mm starts at f/4.5instead of f/3.5 and the telephoto end tops out at 18 mm instead of the 22 mm of the older model. For me though f/4.5 is okay, newer camera bodies have such high quality high ISO settings! Gone were the days when anything above ISO 400 is noise-central. I also didn’t mind that the long end tops out at 18 mm, as I’ve mentioned above, I use the wide ends the most. The new ultrawide’s glass is good though, and that’s what matters the most.
I vowed to myself at that point to sell off three of the four lenses in my inventory, and I did just that in September. (It took an average of 3 weeks to sell the three.) Could you guess which three?
1. The Canon EF 50 mm- I never used it anymore after I got the 40 mm pancake, the focal lengths are too similar and the pancake is much lighter.
2. The Canon EF-S 17-85 mm zoom lens- I never used it anymore as I’ve got my favorite focal lengths covered by the ultra wide and the 40 mm. I rarely shoot anything more telephoto than that. And if I end up needing to “zoom” some more, I just walk closer.
3. My beloved Canon EF-S 10-22 mm ultrawide zoom lens- I sold it to be able to buy the newer and cheaper Canon EF-S 10-18 mm the moment it hit Philippine shores. I was able to sell it for $400, which wholly covered the $350 price of the brand new 10-18!
To recap, my current line up as of October 2014 is the new Canon EF-S 10-18 mm ultrawide and the Canon EF 40 mm pancake. The moment the cheap and tiny Canon EF-S 24mm pancake is available here, I’m getting that too.
These three will be the first time since 2007 I’ll have an all brand new line up (nothing secondhand), and they’ll be also my cheapest lineup ever! Never before in the history of mankind (it’s midnight, excuse my grandiosity) has such lightweight and high quality glass been so cheap! (Good lenses are usually $400 up.)
Another benefit to having these two new lenses (and the third soon-to-arrive one), is they all carry Canon’s newest STM focusing technology for quiet and fast video autofocusing. Previous lenses, while they had great glass like my EF 50 or the EF-S 10-22 ultrawide, were made for stills, so the autofocusing in video mode left a lot to be desired (not to mention in-camera focusing was pretty crap until 2014).
I’ve neglected to mention cameras so far because for me they aren’t as important as the lenses.
I just prefer to use the lightest available. I hate heavy cameras because they hurt my chest, shoulder, and neck, and they take up a lot of space.
I always buy the cheapest CURRENT GENERATION camera. I never buy old cameras. Digital cameras nowadays are not static mechanical devices. They are mini computers, and I don’t want to pay good money for obsolete technology. Every new generation will have faster processors, faster and more accurate autofocusing, and much more refined high ISO settings.
When on a budget, don’t settle for buying an enthusiast-level $1,500 DSLR from the previous generation. Buy the cheapest from the current generation, that $1,000 will knock the boots off the $1,500 previous-generation camera.
Unless you’re a dedicated professional photographer, you wouldn’t need what makes an expensive camera expensive. These usually have zero to do with image quality and more to do with convenience. More frames per seconds, more external buttons for convenience, brighter viewfinder, weather sealing, two memory card slots, are a few of those benefits. These are not frivolous add ons, and they’re worth the additional $1,000 per tier that Canon and Nikon asks from you if you’re a professional who goes to Syria and needs the weather sealing.
But for ordinary enthusiasts, these are things you can safely cut from your budget and still achieve great image quality. All tiers from the current generation have the same image processors anyway, improving on the ones from the previous generation.
Most image-related improvements in DSLRs now improve only incrementally nowadays, but video-related improvements are improving exponentially (as of 2014).
My current DSLR is the cheapest Canon has, the Canon 100D. It’s so small it’s only a little bigger than my palm.
It’s half the price of my previous DSLR, the Canon 60D (which I sold late 2013). The Canon 60D wasn’t the cheapest Canon at the time, it’s considered a mid-level camera.
And yet my cheapest, lowest-tier 100D beats it in almost every metric that matters to me: high ISO settings, ease of shooting video (autofocus speed, etc), and weight and form factor. I do miss the brighter pentaprism viewfinder of the 60D (the cheaper 100D only has a pentamirror finder), but hey, it cost $600 less!
This tiny lightweight body was perfect for travel, a trusty companion to me in Chile. Paired with the Canon EF 40 mm pancake, it looked no bigger than those newfangled mirrorless Panasonics!
Before the 60D, I owned two other Canons (400D and 500D), all the cheapest bodies from the current generation when I bought them. For all four, I always buy in Spring (March or April) six months after they’re first announced. There’s usually a very very slight discount after the yearly February camera trade shows (there’s two a year, spring and fall).
And that’s the story of my camera “go” kit. Through via negativa over 7 years (‘07 to ‘14), I’ve figured out what kind of shooting I like best, and built a cheap, small, lightweight system to help me do just that. And sold off the rest of my gear.
* All photos here taken by me.
** I’m not a gear fetishist, I don’t normally caption photos with the specs of my kit. This post is an exception as it talks about gear recommendations.
This house is one of Pablo Neruda‘s three houses in Chile. The other two are in Santiago (the capital), and Isla Negra.
view of Valparaiso from the bedroom in the house:
I had the menu of the day, which cost around, 7,000 CLP.
it came with a pisco sour, an appetizer, an entree, and a dessert.
The interiors of the place was very nice, with a lot of vintage memorabilia.
Valparaiso, Chile, May 2014
My friend Stewart made this awesome garlic butter and shared it with us last night.
I was intending to use it with my frozen corn and peas, but M.T. smelled it when she saw it in the fridge this morning, and she said it’s so fragrant, we need to consume it this noon.
However, we were out of bread and it was a cold, gray, and damp Renaca day. Nobody wanted to walk to the bakery 3 minutes down the street.
Finally, I volunteered for the team.
And the verdict is….
Delicieux! We couldn’t get enough of it.
Thank you, Stewart.
1. Don Pancho (Rawson street, near P. Montt Avenue. near the interstate bus terminals)
charquican con huevo, a traditional Chilean dish (comida tipica chilena) of mashed potatoes, beef, an egg. It’s really delicious, not to mention cheap. 1,800 CLP.
the dip called pebre they serve with the bread is also delicious.
I liked it so much, I went back two weeks later, and tried the cazuela, another traditional Chilean dish. This one was yet another home run. It was also only 1,800 CLP and really yummy.
2. Hotel Fauna – (Paseo Dimalow on Cerro Concepcion)
went to this rooftop bar twice, great view. food is great, but on the pricey side. great atmosphere, with outdoor seating on the balcony, with a good view of Valparaiso.
3. El Desayunador (Almirante Montt, Cerro Concepcion)
I had the churrasco chacarero sandwich and causeo queso tomato (goat cheese with tomatoes).
4. Casa Cerveceria Altamira – very good locally made craft beer, right beside Ascensor Reina Victoria.
5. East on Placeros Street, Valparaiso- really cheap Japanese food.
6. Casa Hesperia- Valparaiso
decent food, a bit on the salty side. I had the cazuela.
I always take buses that traverse Errazuriz to go to Valpo (also the 6 series, but not 607), but the 607 plies Chacabuco instead of Errazuriz. Chacabuco is parallel to Errazuriz, and ends up almost in the same place, but I got a bit confused when we got off, as it’s the road less traveled for me, and I have a weak sense of direction. I only know how to get to the foot of Cerro Concepcion if I get off at Errazuriz.
We wandered around for half an hour before finally spotting the spire of the green Lutheran church and using that as a guide to get to Cerro Concepcion.
I didn’t mind being lost because we were able to see a lot during our thirty minutes of wandering, as that cerro we were on is a bit off the beaten path and it’s rare for travelers to stumble there by mistake.
We came across a graffiti workshop, then ten minutes later, bumped into my graffiti tour guide Elias, who is on his way to that very workshop!
We also saw Cemetery No. 2, which the guide to the walking tour we joined that afternoon said is the Protestant cemetery. We didn’t go back to this hill, he just pointed in its general direction and mentioned the name. Cemetery No. 1 is the Roman Catholic cemetery, and Cemetery No. 3 is the cemetery for all other religions.
Cemetery No. 2
We also passed a cultural park in what was formerly a prison.
We got to the foot of Cerro Concepcion twenty minutes after getting our bearings, and took the Ascensor Reina Victoria funicular up, then walked five minutes to El Desayunador, where we had planned the day before to go there to have brunch, which turned into a late lunch.
We were starving by the time we were seated. I had these:
churrasco chacarero sandwich
causeo queso tomate (goat cheese with tomatoes)
We walked down to Plaza Anibal Pinto to meet up with walking tour after lunch. He pointed to the Cinzano cafe across the square, which is supposedly the oldest cafe in Valparaiso.
Plaza Anibal Pinto
The guide then introduced us to Emile Dubois, popularly known as the first serial killer of Valparaiso, who killed the rich to give to the poor. He used to live in this building across the square, and when the cops went after him, this is what happened- see caption below photo:
He’s buried in the Playa Ancha cemetery, and he’s now known as the “serial killer saint”, as he’s supposed to grant wishes. People go on privileges to his grave.
We then took the Ascensor Reina Victoria (my second time for the day) to go up Cerro Concepcion, and walked around. Somewhere in the middle of the tour, we took a second funicular, Ascensor El Peral, which led us to the top of Cerro Alegre. (click here to see my post on these two ascensors, plus another).
saw the famous Palacio Baburizza.
We also learned the story of two oldest non-Catholic churches in South America.
The Anglicans built a low key church, with no towers, no bells, in the hopes that the Catholics wouldn’t get pissed. the Catholics did, and according to the guide, their response to build a bigger church (with towers and bells) a few streets down. It was the first non-Catholic church in South America.
The Lutherans (German) were the first to build a structure that had all the traditional hallmarks of a Christian church- towers, bells, the works.
The guide took us to the oldest stock exchange in South America, El Mercurio Building (HQ of the longest continuously running Spanish newspaper in the world), and Little Ben, some English immigrant’s model of the Big Ben in London.
oldest stock exchange
El Mercurio building
We ended up at the pier across Plaza Sotomayor, and M and I headed back up Cerro Concepcion to Hotel Fauna for dinner. A German guy from the walking tour joined us. Capped off the night with a delicious sandwich and Shop Kross golden ale.
Click to see more of my snapshots about this day on Flickr.
These funiculars are over a hundred years old and still running, even if somewhat shakily. It’s around 100 CLP single-trip. Cheaper than the actual elevator of Cerro Cordillera.
I photographed these three funiculars on the same day, when I returned to Cerro Concepcion and Alegre for a third time to join a walking tour. I rode Reina Victoria and El Peral, and just dashed in to photograph Ascensor Concepcion.
Ascensor Reina Victoria (constructed 1902) – you’ll land on Paseo Dimalow, Cerro Concepcion
Ascensor El Peral- you’ll land on Paseo Yugoslavo, Cerro Alegre
Ascensor Concepcion (constructed 1883)- Cerro Concepcion
(oldest and fastest funicular in Valparaiso)
last update: May 21, 2014
The links on this page are arranged in reverse chronological order. (oldest at the top.)
runtime: 28 seconds
Renaca Beach at night, May 21, 2014
Vina del Mar at night, May 12, 2014
video diary of a day at the small fish market on Bustamante St., Valparaiso, Chile. April 24, 2014
runtime: 1 minute 36 seconds